Philosophy and Politics

school of thought has enabled hu piece life to study the general and everyday problems which concern globey matters to include beauty, truth, mind, validity, language, existence, language and thus far truth. While Philosophy is a general term that is highly acceptable to address and answer questions by using systematic approaches and its credibility on the grounds of reasoned argu workforcets, there is a tension that is manifest between politics and Philosophy which Ancient Greek Origin means love of wisdom. frank governance needs laws that are mandated and initiated through Politics.The ways a participation is being governed highly affects the kind of living the citizens experience. Politics are made up of group of people that kneadulate decisions for the betterment of the populace. It has in addition been palpable in many group interactions such as the religious, academic and even in the incarnate world. Despite the fact that both exist to fulfill the needs of man for o rder, it is evident that a man in one point of his life or an otherwise might choose whether to live chthonian the influence of Politics or Philosophy.The issues had been explored in Platos masterpieces Apology and The state. But although, the strain is perceptible, the conclusion result for the mixture of both may lead to a more wonderful life to wholly mankind. The researcher wishes to address any reconciliation that may occur between the rivalries of the two approaches in gentle regulation, if Philosophy and Politics croupe be practiced at the uniform time. Philosophy and Politics in Platos Works Justice is necessitated by human in in all walks of life. An individual is honed by the pagan and social norms that craft his totality as a whole.Many factors attri goode on how a mortal behaves or acts. The life in the world has sought to deal on existence necessitated of man as man to survive and subsist. You may choose to live a political life or you put up pursue a life t hat is committed in finding contemplation and truth. Apology The Apology by Plato is his version of Socrates speech during the time Socrates def completes himself in opposition to the charges. The accusations against Socrates brought up were living his life that refuses to adulate and faith the gods, corrupts the mind of the young and makes new deities.The main theme of the entire speech proposes that Philosophy instigates when one admits that he is ignorant. Socrates dramatically states that the wisdom he has, originates from his mere knowledge that he doesnt know anything (23b, 29b). Politics in this part conducts a lawful proceeding that is made aside of informal charges that only stanched come to the fore of gossips and prejudices against Socrates Socrates is committing an in arbitrator, in that he inquires into things below the earth and in the sky, and makes the weaker argument the stronger, and teaches others to follow his example (18b-c).Socrates refuted the accusations t hrough voicing out that he should not in any way be mistaken as a casuist or a scholar that is highly paid and wise. He then expressed his philosophical ambition that he is poor and does not know anything that is right-hand(a) and noble. Socrates believed that the accusations against him rooted with his compliance with the oracle he acquire in Delhi. He had the mission of solving the paradox which is the ignorant man could be the wisest of all men (23e). It is apparent that Politics has an indirect connection to Philosophy because both aim to provide a good human life course.In this part reconciliation is quite evident since Politics is ruled out by people or humans that present the way to righteousness and lawfulness based on human perception enacted by the law eyepatch Philosophy which Plato deals with dwells more with the spiritual and divine treatment as the correct path to rectitude and uprightness. Socrates perceived that his questioning to many people gained him the repu tation as an annoying person. His life mission interpreted in the speech that true wisdom comes from the gods while wisdoms of man together with their achievements have diminutive or are not valuable at all.It was greatly distressed that Socrates accepts as legitimate that the power of his lawful superior, may it be divine or human should be followed. But when there is a discrepancy or conflict between the two Politics or Philosophy, he deems that the divine authority should take precedence and primacy Gentlemen, I am your grateful and devoted servant, but I owe a greater obedience to God than to you and as long as I draw breath and have my faculties I shall never stop practicing philosophy (Plato, Dialogue Part 1).Socrates articulated that he testament not stop his aspiration for his fellow Athenians to have greater awareness of moral truth and integrity. Though, people might impede his questioning or arguing and even if they withdraw all the charges against him, Socrates put ac ross his plan of not bringing an end to his inquiries for the pursuance of truth. Socrates was charged as criminal by a very small margin (36a). He was sentenced to death through drinking Hemlock. Though, Socrates can resort to emotive tricks to appease the juries.He relied ultimately to the truth in the presentation of his case. Socrates prophesied that the younger and harsher critics get out pursue what he started that can aggravate them even more (39d). The Republic by Plato The Republic by Plato is likewise a Socratic dialogue. The main topic of the dialogue centers at the issue of who is happier between the just and the unjust man that was pictured through creating a make-believe city that is ruled by philosopher-kings. For near part, the dialogue tackles justice in different ways.Like in one part of the first make where two types of justice are presented but both were deemed inappropriate. First, talks about returning debts that some(a)one owed while the second one embark s upon helping out friends at the same time harming the enemies. These were common definitions of justice that Socrates reckons to be derisory in isolated cases and as a consequence lack stringency stipulated of a definition, though he does not wholly decline them because each, in some way or another conveys a universal sagacity of justice.Justice when implemented with Philosophy encompasses goodwill to all mankind. This was evident in the end of Book I where Socrates approved Polemarchus insight that justice embraces helping out friends but the just man would never do any harm to anybody even an enemy. Thrasymachus on the other hand provides his perception of justice as what is good for the stronger (Book I), which reflects those people in Politics who have power over the society. This also echoes Thrasymachus precept that regulations are the primary resource of justice in every city where in they enact laws that take in themselves the most.Philosophy is widely tackled in The R epublic to influence Politics on what it should build within the society to provide a just community. In this dialogue, it can be seen that Philosophy and Politics can be reconciled though Philosophy still takes supremacy over Politics. Correspondingly, Socrates describes justice as working at that which he is naturally vanquish suited, along with to do ones own business and not to be a busybody (433a-433b). He then continues by presenting how to sustain and perfect justice through common chord cardinal number virtues to include Temperance, Wisdom, and Courage (433a-433b).Philosophy correlates with Politics through creating a society that divides people in to three distinct types which are the soldier, producer and ruler. Books II to IV mainly carry out that if a ruler can create just laws, and when the soldiers or warriors follow the orders of their rulers, and if authorities are obeyed by the producers, then it will formulate a society that is rightful and just, thus creating a happier life. Three arguments were presented by Plato why he sees that it is better to be just rather than for the individual to be unjust.The arguments were An oppressors nature will allow for him to incur horrid pains and pangs and that the conventional tyrant has a lifestyle that is mentally and physically dispute on a ruler which is the total opposite of a philosopher king that is truth loving (Book IX). other argument in Book IX that Plato puts forward is that the Philosopher is the only type of ruler that can best run a society since he is acquainted to the soma of the Good. The last one that Plato contends is that Pleasures which are approved by the lover of wisdom and reason are the truest (Book IX).The Republics main ideology is to form the government and politics that is governed by philosopher-kings. In this, it is highly susceptible that Philosophy and politics could in some way or another worked hand in hand. Socrates believes that the four types of ruling such as timocracy, democracy, oligarchy and totalism can lead to corruption of power. The Republic by Plato also contains his Allegory of the Cave where he elucidates how a former prisoner from a cave came to realize that the sun which illuminates the surrounding and which initially blinded him is the Form of the Good that causes the brightness.He also came to realize that it is the sun that made him see and appreciate the beauty and goodness in the things that surround him. Plato considers the caveman as the philosopher, who knows the Form of Good and therefore should educate others to spread the same light he achieved. The dialogue narrates conversations and arguments concerning an Ideal State by manipulating politics through Philosophical ideas and how other forms of governance could not properly and adequately sustain its ruling. ConclusionThough Platos Apology and The Republic mainly discuss how Philosophy or love of wisdom should be adhered over and above anything else, it also manif ested that Philosophy and politics can reconcile to the betterment of the society. The Apology chiefly venerates Philosophy over politics but in some parts evidently address that people involved in Politics should be respected and followed, hence, when a clash between the two takes place Philosophy should win against the other. Platos The Republic on the other hand, points out a Political institution that is to be ruled by a Philosopher towards a just society.